A Reciprocal Intercommunication between Reader and Writer: A Critical Study of Cyber Literature

Authors

  • Jamirul Islam Department of English, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad

Keywords:

Cyber Literature; Poetry; Social Media; Interactivity; Reception Theory; Reader Response Theory etc.

Abstract

Since the accessibility of the internet, cyber literature can be an act of bringing ease, evolving preferences and mindsets. This research may be a survey focused on the opinions of the respondents on the nature of social media cyber literature; of its gain and effect on the reader. This research is limited to the collective poems on Facebook. The logic is simple; the shortened version is preferred. Poetry is more likely to be used for the interpretation of reader-writer interactivity in cyber literature. The technique is the literary theory of reader reaction with attention to Facebook's reader-writer personalization. The objectives of this article were to expose the impetus of audiences to react to the submitted text, the reasons why they really like, and what its benefits are. The findings showed that cyber literature is effective in implementing a substitute writing style that also improves writers’ enthusiasm and imagination to make use of the digital content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext and the History of Writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Eskelinen, M. (2012). Cybertext Poetics: International Texts In Critical Media Aesthetics. New York: Continuum.

Foucault, M. (1991). What is an Author? In Paul Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 141-160). New York: Penguin Books.

Fruin, N. W. (2013). Reading Digital Literature: Surface, Data, Interaction, and Expressive Processing. In Siemens, R. & Schreibman, S. (Eds), A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. West Sussex. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Hayles, K. (2001). Cyber literature and Multicourses: Rescuing Electronic Literature from Infanticide. Retrieved from < http://www.electronicbookreview.com/ thread/electropoetics/interspecial>

Holub, R.C. (1984). Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Mcthuen & Co. Ltd.

Hooverm, D .L., Culpeper, J., & O‟Halloran, K. (2014). Digital Literary Studies: Corpus Approaches to Poetry, Prose, and Drama. New York: Routledge.

Jauss, H.R. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Katherine, N. (2008). Electronic Literature : New Horizons for the Literary. USA: University of Notre Dome.

Nelson, T. (1993). Literary Machines. Sausalitu, CA: Mindful press.

Ryan, M. L. (2013). Fictional Worlds in the Digital Age. In Siemens, R. & Schreibman, S. (Eds), A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. West Sussex. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Sanz, A., & Romero, D. (2007). Literatures in the Digital Era: Theory and Praxis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Tompkins, Jane P. (Ed.) (1980). Reader-response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1956). Theory of Literature. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

Islam, J. (2022). A Reciprocal Intercommunication between Reader and Writer: A Critical Study of Cyber Literature. European Journal of Volunteering and Community-Based Projects, 1(1), 26-37. Retrieved from https://pkp.odvcasarcobaleno.it/index.php/ejvcbp/article/view/49